The Trump administration is seeking to challenge a 90-year-old Supreme Court decision called Humphrey’s Executor that limits the president’s ability to fire appointed leaders of federal agencies without cause. The decision established that presidents cannot remove agency leaders without just cause, a concept that has been instrumental in shaping the modern U.S. government. However, conservative legal theorists argue that the Constitution grants vast power to the president and reject limitations imposed by Congress and the courts. The current Supreme Court, with a conservative majority, has shown some agreement with this perspective in recent decisions.
The administration’s challenge to Humphrey’s Executor could have far-reaching implications for the independence of federal agencies, potentially affecting the ability of agencies to regulate labor relations, employment discrimination, and other areas. Critics argue that this could politicize agencies and jeopardize their ability to act independently. The outcome of this legal battle could fundamentally reshape the relationship between presidents and federal agencies in the U.S. government.
Source
Note: The image is for illustrative purposes only and is not the original image of the presented article.
