As Americans shift their focus from Thanksgiving to Christmas, the debate between real and artificial Christmas trees arises. Data shows that artificial trees are more popular, with many households opting for a second tree in addition to a real one. Both types of trees have environmental impacts, with artificial trees producing more global warming gases in their production and eventual disposal, while real trees absorb carbon dioxide while growing and provide habitat for wildlife.
Disposing of a real tree in an eco-friendly manner can benefit the environment, such as mulching or providing habitat for birds. On the other hand, artificial trees made from non-recyclable materials and often transported long distances have a higher carbon footprint, but can become more sustainable if used for several years.
The best way to make an artificial tree more eco-friendly is to use it for multiple years and potentially buy a second-hand tree. Choosing low-energy LED lights and avoiding frequent disposal of the tree can lower its overall environmental impact. Ultimately, the decision between a real or artificial tree should consider factors such as disposal methods, distance traveled, and long-term use to minimize the ecological footprint during the holiday season.
Photo credit
www.usatoday.com
